Skip to main content
Haiqu’s Orchestration Engine Cuts Quantum Cloud Costs for Utility-Scale Quantum Dynamics Simulation by 350× This notebook demonstrates how to use Haiqu to achieve a 350× cost reduction in quantum cloud computing bill. For concreteness, it uses a utility-scale quantum dynamics simulation of the 2D transverse-field Ising model on 127 qubits (Nature Article). By leveraging proprietary algorithms and orchestration, Haiqu reduces the quantum processor runtime from 4 hours to under 1 minute and quantum cloud bill from ~\10,000to 10,000 to ~\\30. Why the tranverse-field ising model? Universal behavior: Many physical systems and optimization problems—including scheduling, routing, and other combinatorial tasks—can be mapped onto Ising-type Hamiltonians. Classically intractable: In the regime where interaction terms compete, quantum dynamics can generate strong entanglement that quickly overwhelms scalable classical simulation methods. How does Haiqu perform? At 127 qubits and a two-qubit gate depth of 15 (710 CNOTs), the evolution circuit exceeds the reach of brute-force classical simulation. Haiqu handles this regime with ease. Haiqu’s runtime engine achieves the same the accuracy as reported by IBM, but at a fraction of the time and cost: 41 seconds (Haiqu) vs. 4 hours (IBM) and $33 (Haiqu) versus $11,520 (IBM) (350× cost reduction). Having a bug or an issue? Submit feedback Initialize the notebook Import the necessary libraries, setup credentials, initialize the Haiqu SDK, load the device, and show the connectivity map.
Define the simulation The transverse-field Ising Hamiltonian H=Hint+HfieldH = H_{\text{int}} + H_{\text{field}} consists of two terms. The interaction term Hint=Ji,jZiZj,H_{\text{int}} = -J \sum_{\langle i,j \rangle} Z_i Z_j , couples neighboring spins with strength JJ, favoring alignment along z^\hat{z}. The field term Hfield=hi=0N1Xi,H_{\text{field}} = h \sum_{i=0}^{N-1} X_i , randomizes alignment along z^\hat{z} by pushing spins towards x^\hat{x} with a transverse field strength hh. Because HintH_{\text{int}} and HfieldH_{\text{field}} do not commute, HH cannot be directly mapped onto quantum processors. To address this, the evolution circuit is approximated as a sequence of m=t/Δtm = t/\Delta t discrete steps with duration Δt\Delta t: U(t)=eiHt=ei(Hint+Hfield)t(eiHfieldΔteiHintΔt)m.\begin{aligned} U(t) &= e^{-iHt} \\ &= e^{-i (H_{\text{int}} + H_{\text{field}}) t} \\ % &\approx e^{-i H_{\text{field}} \Delta t} \, e^{-i H_{\text{int}} \Delta t}. &\approx \left(e^{-i H_{\text{field}} \Delta t}\, e^{-i H_{\text{int}} \Delta t}\right)^m. \end{aligned}
The average system magnetization M=1Ni=0N1ZiM = \frac{1}{N} \sum_{i=0}^{N-1} Z_i sums over individual spins on qubit ii Z0=ZIZ1=IZIZ2=IIZIZi=IZI.\begin{aligned} Z_0 &= Z \otimes I \otimes \cdots \\ Z_1 &= I \otimes Z \otimes I \otimes \cdots \\ Z_2 &= I \otimes I \otimes Z \otimes I \otimes \cdots \\ Z_i &= I \otimes \cdots \otimes Z \otimes \cdots \otimes I. \end{aligned} for number of qubits NN, identity operator II, and Pauli-Z operator ZZ.
Define and run scenarios Four scenarios are considered:
  1. Ideal - Simulated noise-free baseline results.
  2. Noisy - Run on quantum processor without error mitigation.
  3. IBM - Run on quantum processor with IBM error mitigation (Sparse Pauli-Lindblad Noise Learning + ZNE + PEA).
  4. Haiqu - Run on quantum processor with Haiqu proprietary error mitigation and orchestration engine.
Results are compared in terms of quality (closeness to ideal) and efficiency (resource utilization).
Learn from results 💡 Good to Know: Average magnetization decrease with increasing transverse field strength hh as spins are pushed towards x^\hat{x} and randomized along the measurement axis z^\hat{z}. The solution obtained with Haiqu matches the one obtained by IBM. Both improve quality versus the noisy benchmark.
💡 Good to Know: Haiqu’s algorithmic and orchestration engine reduces the time to solution from 4h to 41s and the cost of solution from ~$10,000 to ~$30 compared to IBM’s implementation. This is enabled through the use of proprietary lightweight, high-efficiency error mitigation algorithms and orchestration.
Get in Touch Documentation portal docs.haiqu.ai Contact Support feedback.haiqu.ai Follow Us on LinkedIn latest news on LinkedIn Visit Our Website Learn more about Haiqu Inc. on haiqu.ai Business Inquiries Contact us at info@haiqu.ai